![]() |
F1 split design |
[[TOC]]
The F1 interface is the functional split of 3GPP between the CU (centralized unit: PDCP, RRC, SDAP) and the DU (distributed unit: RLC, MAC, PHY). It is standardized in TS 38.470 - 38.473 for 5G NR.
F1 specs:
F1-C:
F1-U:
No equivalent for 4G exists.
The interface F1-C is designed for the exchange of signalling messages between the Radio Network Layer (RNL) and the Transport Network Layer (TNL). It consists of F1 Application Protocol messages (F1-AP) exchanged over SCTP.
F1-U uses GTP-U for information exchange.
The implementation of F1AP messages is seamlessly integrated into OAI, supporting both Monolithic SA and CU/DU functional split modes. The F1 code is therefore always compiled with nr-softmodem. This architecture ensures that even when operating a monolithic gNB, internal information exchange always utilizes F1AP messages. The major difference lies in the CU/DU split scenario, where ASN.1-encoded F1AP messages (F1-C) are exchanges over SCTP, via a socket interface.
This is the current status:
Refer to FEATURE_SET.md to learn about the current F1AP implementation status.
The F1 interface is used internally between CU (mostly RRC) and DU (mostly MAC)
to exchange information. In DL, the CU sends messages as defined by the
callbacks in mac_rrc_dl.h
, whose implementation is defined in files
mac_rrc_dl_direct.c
(monolithic) and mac_rrc_dl_f1ap.c
(for F1AP). In the
monolithic case, the RRC calls directly into the message handler on the DU side
(mac_rrc_dl_handler.c
). In the F1 case, an ITTI message is sent to the CU
task, sending an ASN.1-encoded F1AP message. The DU side's DU task decodes the
message, and then calls the corresponding handler in mac_rrc_dl_handler.c
.
Thus, the message flow is the same in both F1 and monolithic cases, with the
difference that F1AP encodes the messages using ASN.1 and sends over a socket.
In UL, the callbacks defined in mac_rrc_ul.h
are implemented by
mac_rrc_ul_direct.c
(monolithic) and mac_rrc_ul_f1ap.c
(F1). In the direct
case, an ITTI message is directly sent to the RRC task (hence, there is no
dedicated handler). In F1, the DU task receives the ITTI message, encodes using
ASN.1, and sends it over a network socket. The CU task decodes, and sends the
same ITTI message to the RRC task as done directly in the monolithic case.
Summary of callbacks and handlers:
Entity | Callback definition | Callback F1 Implementation | Callback Monolithic SA Implementation | Handler |
---|---|---|---|---|
CU/RRC | mac_rrc_dl.h |
mac_rrc_dl_f1ap.c |
mac_rrc_dl_direct.c |
No handler (use ITTI) |
DU/MAC | mac_rrc_ul.h |
mac_rrc_ul_f1ap.c |
mac_rrc_ul_direct.c |
mac_rrc_dl_handler.c |
A sequence diagram for downlink F1AP messages over the OAI CU/DU functional split:
and for the uplink F1AP messages:
Alternative sequence handling (e.g. Monolithic), for downlink:
and for the uplink:
Current status:
As mentioned earlier, OAI uses F1 internally. It is always compiled in.
To start CU/DU, you use ./nr-softmodem
with the appropriate configuration
files, for instance:
sudo cmake_targets/ran_build/build/nr-softmodem -O ci-scripts/conf_files/gnb-cu.sa.band78.106prb.conf
sudo cmake_targets/ran_build/build/nr-softmodem -O ci-scripts/conf_files/gnb-du.sa.band78.106prb.rfsim.conf
These files are tested in the CI, and are configured for use in docker,
see this docker-compose
file.
The rules to decide if a config triggers a start of a DU, CU, or monolithic gNB, are, in order:
MACRLCs
section lists f1
as northbound transport preference
(tr_n_preference
), it is a DU.gNBs
section lists f1
as a southound transport preference
(tr_s_preference
), it is a CU.The following paragraphs explain the IP configuration for F1 in the OAI config
files on the example of a a local deployment. We assume that the CU will bind
on 192.168.70.129
towards the core, 127.0.0.3
towards the DU, and the DU
127.0.0.4
towards the CU.
In the CU file:
gNBs.[0].amf_ip_address
and gNBs.[0].NETWORK_INTERFACES
section towards the core (typically, OAI CN is configured to provide a docker
bridge on 192.168.70.129
and the AMF is on 192.168.70.132
):
gNBs.[0].amf_ip_address.[0].ipv4 192.168.70.132
gNBs.[0].NETWORK_INTERFACES.GNB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_NG_AMF 192.168.70.129
gNBs.[0].NETWORK_INTERFACES.GNB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_NGU 192.168.70.132
gNBs.[0].tr_s_preference
(transport south-bound) to f1
gNBs.[0].local_s_address
(CU-local south address) for the
F1-C/SCTP and F1-U/GTP/UDP south-bound interfaces: 127.0.0.3
gNBs.[0].remote_s_address
(CU-remote/DU south address) is
ignored, but we recommend to put 0.0.0.0
("any")local_s_portc
in CU should match remote_n_portc
in DUlocal_s_portd
in CU should match remote_n_portd
in DUremote_s_portc
in CU should match local_n_portc
in DUremote_s_portd
in CU should match local_n_portd
in DUIn the DU file:
MACRLCs.[0].tr_n_preference
to f1
MACRLCs.[0].local_n_address
(local north-bound address of the DU) to
127.0.0.4
. This IP address is used to bind the F1-C/SCTP and F1-U/GTP/UDP
socket.MACRLCs.[0].local_n_address_f1u
which is used to bind
F1-U/GTP/UDP instead; F1-C/SCTP will still bind to the address in
MACRLCs.[0].local_n_address
.MACRLCs.[].remote_n_address
(remote north-bound address of the CU)
to 127.0.0.3
. This IP address is used as the CU destination IP address for
F1AP communication.Note: at the DU, you can bind to different interfaces for F1-C and F1-U with
the options MACRLCs.[0].local_n_address
and
MACRLCs.[0].local_n_address_f1u
, respectively. Note that this is not foreseen
for the CU; in the case of the CU, please use separate CU-UP and CU-CP.
Upon F1 Setup Request of a new DU, the CU cross-checks that
gNBs.[0].gNB_ID
, andgNBs.[0].nr_cellid
, andgNBs.[0].servingCellConfigCommon.[0].physCellId
.If any of these are the same, the CU will reject the DU with an F1 Setup Failure. Thus, you should make sure that in the DU's configs, these parameters are set differently.
You have to of course make sure that the local interface of the DU
(MACRLCs.[0].local_n_address
) is different as well.
Assuming you use RFsim, you should make the RFsimulator server side (typically
the gNB) bind on different hosts (rfsimulator.serverport
).
The CU and DU interfaces are based on ITTI threads (see common/utils/ocp_itti/itti.md
)
adopted by all OAI upper layers to run isolated threads dedicated to one feature.
A "task" is a Linux thread running an infinite waiting loop on one ITTI queue.
The app
task manages the initial configuration; the sctp
task manages the
SCTP Linux sockets.
The CU encoding/decoding runs in the task executing F1AP_CU_task()
. It stores its private data context in a static variable.
The DU encoding/decoding runs in the task executing F1AP_DU_task()
. The design is similar to CU task.
All GTP-U tunnels are managed in a Linux Thread, that have partially ITTI design:
The CU thread starts when the CU starts. It opens listening socket on the
configuration-specified IP/port by sending the appropriate message to
TASK_SCTP
. It will accept any incoming connection and forward any F1 message
to RRC.
You can trace any message by looking up the handler
cu_task_handle_sctp_data_ind()
, which ultimately triggers a corresponding
ITTI message sent to RRC. All ITTI messages arriving are dispatched in the ITTI
message handling function in rrc_gNB.c
. For your convenience, find below a
table of same messages that might arrive from the DU and how they are
forwarded.
After handling messages, the RRC uses a callback that determines if messages go directly to the MAC or are sent to the CU ITTI task (see above)
You might also want to consult TS 38.401 regarding the message exchange.
Incoming F1 message | ITTI message to RRC | RRC handler | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
F1 Setup Request | F1AP_SETUP_REQ |
rrc_gNB_process_f1_setup_req() |
will trigger either a response or failure |
Initial UL RRC Message Transfer | F1AP_INITIAL_UL_RRC_MESSAGE |
rrc_gNB_process_initial_ul_rrc_message() |
first message from UE, follows up with RRC Setup or Reestablishment |
UL RRC Message Transfer | F1AP_UL_RRC_MESSAGE |
rrc_gNB_decode_dcch() |
UL RRC messages contain DCCH |
UE Context Response | F1AP_UE_CONTEXT_SETUP_RESP |
rrc_CU_process_ue_context_setup_response() |
does not trigger a follow-up, as UE sends Security Response |
UE Context Modification Response | F1AP_UE_CONTEXT_MODIFICATION_RESP |
rrc_CU_process_ue_context_modification_response() |
triggers Reconfiguration if CellGroup in answer |
UE Context Modification Required | F1AP_UE_CONTEXT_MODIFICATION_REQUIRED |
rrc_CU_process_ue_modification_required() |
triggers Reconfiguration |
UE Context Release Request | F1AP_UE_CONTEXT_RELEASE_REQ |
rrc_CU_process_ue_context_release_request() |
RRC will trigger UE release |
UE Context Release Complete | F1AP_UE_CONTEXT_RELEASE_COMPLETE |
rrc_CU_process_ue_context_release_complete() |
frees UE Context, signals to NGAP |
The task "gNB app", after reading the configuration file, sends a message
F1AP_DU_REGISTER_REQ
to the DU task. This message contains network
configuration for the establishment of the SCTP connection, as well as the F1
Setup Request to be sent to the CU.
Using the network configuration, the DU task sets up an SCTP connection via the SCTP task. When it receives from the SCTP task the socket creation success, the DU task encodes and sends the F1 setup message to the CU.
Similarly as for the CU, you can trace any message by looking up the handler
du_task_handle_sctp_data_ind()
. Unlike in the CU, the decoders do NOT send an
ITTI message, but directly call into the scheduler via a message handling
function. This handler acquires the scheduler mutex and executes the
corresponding message handling functionality. All handlers are in
mac_rrc_dl_handler.c
.
After handling messages, the MAC uses a callback that determines if messages are sent back to RRC via ITTI, or are sent to the DU ITTI task (see above)
You might also want to consult TS 38.401 regarding the message exchange.
Incoming F1 message | MAC handler | Comments |
---|---|---|
F1 Setup Response | f1_setup_response() |
the DU does not start the radio before receiving this message |
DL RRC Message Transfer | dl_rrc_message_transfer() |
Processing timer started if reconfiguration is present[^footnote-reconfig] |
UE Context Setup Request | ue_context_setup_request() |
|
UE Context Modification Request | ue_context_modification_request() |
|
UE Context Modification Confirm | ue_context_modification_confirm() |
|
UE Context Modification Refuse | ue_context_modification_refuse() |
Will trigger release request |
UE Context Release Command | ue_context_release_command() |
Starts timer for release if UE in sync |
[^footnote-reconfig]: The DU does not decode RRC messages, and does not know
whether an RRC message is a reconfiguration. However, the spec mandates that
a reconfiguration has to be triggered if the CU receives a CellGroupConfig,
originating at the DU. See also flag expect_reconfiguration
.
In the DU in UL, RLC checks in deliver_sdu()
if we are operating in split
mode, and either (direct) calls pdcp_data_ind
(DRB) or (f1ap) sends a GTP
message through the GTP API.
In the CU in UL, assuming the tunnel is in place, GTP decapsulates the packet
and calls the callback cu_f1u_data_req()
, which calls pdcp_data_ind()
in CU.
In the CU in DL, the PDCP function deliver_pdu_drb_gnb()
either (direct) calls
into the RLC via enqueue_rlc_data_req()
, or (f1ap) sends a GTP message
through the GTP API.
In the DU in DL, assuming the GTP-U tunnel exists, GTP decapsulates the packet
and calls the reception call back du_rlc_data_req()
, which calls
enqueue_rlc_data_req()
in turn.
In GTP-U, TS 29.281 specifies a optional header (NR RAN Container). This extension header may be transmitted in a G-PDU over the X2-U, Xn-U and F1-U user plane interfaces, but it is not mandatory.
Note that the GTP-U uses internal tables. Instead of exposing TEIDs, it uses the UE ID (RNTI, RRC UE ID) and Radio Bearer ID to map to a TEID for outgoing GTP-U packets. Upon receiving, it does the reverse and calls the callbacks. In the CU case, the DRB tunnel to DU and the tunnel on N3 have the same keys (RRC UE ID, RB ID), but they run in two different GTP-U instances. Each instance binds on diffrent sockets, which is the reason you cannot have the same interface for F1-U and N3/NG-U interfaces (this can be considered a design flaw).
In F1AP, for each "DRB to Be Setup Item IEs", we have a field TNL (transport network layer) to set a specific GTP tunnel (@IP, TEid). This is the same for each message related to DRBs.
So, For each F1AP containing DRB setup/modification/deletion, the related GTP-U tunnels will be modified one to one. The exception is the intialisation of new tunnel: in the call to tunnel creation, we need to send the remote TEID, but we don't know yet if we are the initial source. In this case, we issue a dummy (0xFFFF) remote TEID; when we receive the remote answer, we get the source teid, with which the GTP-U endpoint is updadet.
Вы можете оставить комментарий после Вход в систему
Неприемлемый контент может быть отображен здесь и не будет показан на странице. Вы можете проверить и изменить его с помощью соответствующей функции редактирования.
Если вы подтверждаете, что содержание не содержит непристойной лексики/перенаправления на рекламу/насилия/вульгарной порнографии/нарушений/пиратства/ложного/незначительного или незаконного контента, связанного с национальными законами и предписаниями, вы можете нажать «Отправить» для подачи апелляции, и мы обработаем ее как можно скорее.
Опубликовать ( 0 )